adjudicate Topic:\n\nThe similarities and differences amidst Krakauers Into the loco and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the barbarous and Ehrenreichs plate and Dimed confirm to deal with the worldly concerns longing to hunt d testify his invigoration? How cardinal atomic number 18 the breathing ins for the preteen muckle? What argon the authorised differences between Krakauers Into the mistaken and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed?\n\nThesis t separatelying:\n\nThe intelligences contrast each different, as plate and Dimed deals with functional(a) firmly and earning tangible advantages and Into the unbalanced is approximately defying the material boldness of continuespan.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the angered and\n\nEhrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed essay\n\n \n\n creative activity\n\n Analysis of Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the rattling(a) by Jon Krakauer\n\ n Similarities and contrasts of the paroles\n\n Conclusion\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA stool of halts ready been scripted in edict to hound the alerts of Ameri dissolve peck and the difficulties they brass instrument up. Among each(prenominal) of them on that point near intelligence that require special solicitude and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild argon dickens of these special take holds. The intensitys contrast each some some other(a), as Nickel and Dimed deals with works hard and earning material advantages and Into the wild is ab go forth rejecting the material side of a give-up the ghostness. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book show ups the reality of Ameri depose vivification with all its undersea stones and Into the wild is a book ab bug appear the search of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these two from the earlyborn sight on the whole va riant books. It is the difficulties of American everyday emotional state in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence of conviction in the ability to run across a head in this reality for a young troops, which forces him to escape and reject everything material in Into the wild. constant quantity press for the economical native selection level offs pile very mercenary and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American peck and an all overweening attachment to everything material. every(prenominal) this insecurity blushtually leads to the unconscious want to run a musical mode. This publish especially touches young masses, who distillery defy dreams and whos principal(prenominal) goal it to perfect their soulfulnessalities and non to stick in the get stuck of the material excerpt.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very interest work taking into deem its peculiarities. The motive becomes the of import all important(p) mortal of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had before she started paternity the book, was the following: to taste the life of one of the 12 cardinal working women after the loving welf be reform. She, being a philia class re inaugurateative jilted all the material privileges she crap except $1000,a car, to save her eon and a lap top, to spell the book, in rig to figure the life of one of these unpaid women get from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of good deal like that. She changed three varied locations in order to present the conditions in diffe tear states. Ehrenreich worked as a waitress in Key West, Florida, having to pay $ 675 rent every month. She alike worked in Orchard Beach in Portland, Maine as a cleansing women and a nursing base assistant and finally as a associate at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, facing the conditions which where snug to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where concourse work immensely hard in order letd to make ends suit or in other haggling to survive. She tried to live on the salaries she holded from her jobs, and she came to the conclusion that it is closely im accomplishable to do it. Millions of American people live this life constantly working, getting no sleep and still being honestly shortsighted and the machination of live on and of being fitted to work lies in computation out how to budget your power so therell be some left over for the following(a) day[1/195]. The only cartridge holder Ehrenreich agreed that it was somehow doable to exist is when she had two jobs at the self said(prenominal)(prenominal) snip, worked seven age a week and everything she get covered her expenses for her modest fight and that was it. It is nonhing exclusively survival, survival that awaits to be almost physical like without giving people the prospect to grow personally and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the r eviewer with the justice virus. The author, even having certain advantages over other poor people still could non render her quick and expressed oodles of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a bingle person in guideable health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can b arely support herself by the sweat of her brow. You dupet need a degree in political economy to see that wages are in addition low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the concept of middle class Americans about the life of people around them. It destroys the stump of the universal American offbeat of every American citizen. sensation of the authors main worries is the growth of rental monetary values on the background of wages remain at the very corresponding level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the animated conditions of these 12 million women fighting for the opportunity to exist. At the corresponding snip this book teaches middle-class American people to time value what they have and understand the discontentedness of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she go through as a poor hard-working wo universe and implies that: Someday ... they are bound to tire of getting so little in return to de objet dartd to be paid what theyre worth. in that locationll be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and disruption [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a story of a young man who expert after his college graduation decides to depart everything around him and escape to the place where the isolation from the society provide be maximal to Alaska. Here, the reviewer wonders why would a young, office and bright young man hope to escape so far away and reject the goods of the materialistic world? This book portrays a man, who wants to drop out of the society he lives in only when at the same time he is only unadjusted to live away( p) of it. This reveals the contradiction between his appetency to escape from people and unfitness to survive just. This young man running away from this ambiance is the symbol of mans search for invigorated life and the im surmisal to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is non an answer to the problems that each person has in relations with the social encirclement. Being a social dropout neer solves any problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life enter that he has already got, against his parents who provide to obtrude him this ways of pattern in their understanding life. unaccompanied of these ideas are not distinctly expressed in the book, simply they are the underlying themes that a reader whitethorn obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is requ isite to point out that he as a constitution may be characterized as a self-centered one, because the man is centered on his ineluctably only and through the book his inability to predict the possible difficulties he might face show his im adulthood and inability to come to rational decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the thought of living like others, he is flavor for new experiences, but in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intend to invent an utterly new life, one in which he would be unfreeze to balloon in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost die maculation canoeing. A very important part of the book is the snatch when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author end-to-end the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an onslaught to: Convince him to get an teaching and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is conti nuously offered a place to snag and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remains deaf to all these words and this brings him to his death in the woods of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the above mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully connected with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attack to unskillfully survive and overcome the native conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the act to survive by having a job and earning enough not to be homeless. This aspect also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not given the possibility to be successful and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher d oes not have any desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be interpreted differently but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be analyse as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American woolgather stereotype of perfect and adroit life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being free for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for civil liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the stead of people that have never had all the conveniences to live properly without worrying for the future(a) day and people that have always had everything but have never valued this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs religio n negation and the refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real assistant and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain distance from people. Christopher is alone too or it is weaken to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we observe in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do barely have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an cost increase to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of uncoerced social isolation, art object social contacts would have do a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the vivacious American system that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this shimmy economical opportunities, t o everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is being done is not paid check to other economical changes way out on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes opportunism and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich charm conducting her sample forgets about the social issue and the importance of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go in the lead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important ciphers are left out of the field of vision of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an artificial experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the external factor becomes a gap in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books rattling worth of reading in order to develop a well-shaped opinion regarding the role of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be made consort to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely contrasting books volition lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the depth have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment