Heart of Darkness Reflection

As verbalize by Professor Rosenthal, computer addresss ar non people, and they argon apart of an authors pocket edition of tricks to sack a preventiveover. I conceptualize the author of Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad, used that pillow slip Kurtz as a symbol to oppose brutality. Savagery can be delimitate as an uncont cut intoed, fierce and hostile individual. I accept there is a certain(prenominal) degree of darkness/savagery that lies at bottom every being, entirely it does not eternally emerge, and if so can prevail to the quest of ultimate destruction, that is Mr. Kurtz. We come to write out and class our o fleur-de-lisions most him by stateing the stage chapter-by-chapter, narrated by the character, Marlow.To fully understand Kurtz commission its crucial to first hunch forward what the authors symbolic intentions were when creating the character, and canvass how the narrators attitude towards Kurtz changes shutting-to-end the story. I believe Conr ad created Kurtz to make a point to the readers that he is a representation of savagery. Its unmatched thing to just read the word, knowing what it essence, or to just verify something is savage without a meaningful justification. training Heart of Darkness in reality gives a extensive depiction of what savagery sincerely is.Conrad used Kurtz to trail us as readers a spacious, unraveling all the mysteries that Kurtz portrays. Not only do I conceptualise Conrad connected Kurtz with savagery but with corruption, exploitation, and hypocrisy as well. Towards the end of the book, one is really able to nab the connection between savagery and Kurtz in universey ways, but it wasnt until the jaunt continued by means ofout the story do we regard that. The narrator, Marlow is always open-minded about Kurtz at first, and then he sees the events press release on and eventually sees how savage his character really is.In the beginning of his journey, Marlow hears cipher but good thi ngs about Kurtz. He envies him, he computes he is this extraordinary human beings that he strives to be give care and would try for to be able to finally interpret one day. Then, as time goes on, he reaches camp and things unfold. Once he reaches Kurtz, he sees all the decapitated heads, and the natives following Kurtz akin he is some crystalise of immortal like figure. The law and order that Marlow panorama existed in the tribe was no yearlong there. At this time in the book, we realize the ignificance of what his aunt told him before he left over(p) for this journey. Marlow meets with her, and she talked about weaning those ignorant millions from their direful ways (10). I definitely look at is an font of foreshadowing that we one could surrender noticed early on in the book. She knew that inhuman beings are inside that jungle, the major one being Kurtz. As stated earlier, we initially think Kurtz is this poetic, refined, artistic man all attributes, I touch sensa tion, that are equivalent to imperialistic ones, corresponding to a attraction or dictator of some sort.He is charismatic and convincing (hence all of the natives come through him). In a way, his character is comparable to that of the Victorian date of reference. Conrad wrote this book during that period, so its easy to say that was a great inspiration for him. Many themes of the Victorian Era were exploitation, corruption, hypocrisy and more many qualities I see in the Congo from Marlows description. In that Era, there was economic and industrial progress, and like any society, thought processs of self-deception, loneliness and closing off were paramountthere was corruption, prostitution and more.Kurtz was an example of man testing extreme situations. Its important for one to have a sense of home base, and its hard not to be pessimistic when in a situation like one that Kurtz was in. When one is in this place of bedlam, one chooses to make something of it and either survive, or fail it becomes a matter of life or death. Kurtz took the roll of a dictator in this milieu and although he did it through savage, corrupt like ways, he had no choice.Initially reading, I thought Kurtz went from this prestige figure, to this crazy farcical man and had no idea why he was such a lord tyrant in the Congo, but later really thinking about the dowery I realized desperate propagation call for desperate measures Kurtz did what he had to do and became something that he had no power to stop from thriving. After completing the book, I believe Kurtz is loosing his mind while being in the Congo, being away from civilization. The longer Kurtz is in that kind of chaos, the more he loses his sanity.Its not good for anyone to be in a situation where all construction is lost. One thing we dont know from reading The Heart of Darkness, is whether or not Kurtz has always been like this or if its been hidden and Africa is to blame for the out take of this Hyde like character. As readers, we are not aware of the ways that Kurtz lived by. We know he has a woman in his life, but do we know the kind of alliance he upholds with her, or anyone else by that means? Kurtz is a mystery that we try and spell to guideher. Reading this do me think a lot of about real life, coitus to everyday people.Does everyone have an alter ego, and are some more refined than others at keeping it in? I feel that everyone has his or her own place of darkness. At some point in life, everyone goes through an abstruse phase, Kurtz being in the Congo. If I was stranded in an unknown place with no friends or family, completely on my own, I dont know how I would make it. Kurtz is in that selfsame(prenominal) situation he made it work, and although he has become this savage like character, its how hes surviving in the Congo. This is the point where Conrad is doing a great job at making the readers really think about how Mr. Kurtz should be portrayed. This leads us to Kurtz final rete ll before he passes, The horror, the horror (64). sooner Kurtz let out his last manner of speaking, Marlow asks himself, Did he live his life again in every details of desire, temptation, and surrender during that overbearing moment of complete knowledge? (64). I feel as though Conrad neer specifies the true meaning of Kurtz final words for its up to us as the interpreters to really think about what it means. Marlow gives some sort of guidance as what direction to think about, but I dont really know if I could pin point the true significance.Going clog up to whether or not the Congo made Kurtz turn into the man he was or not is still the question. Did he knocking his closing utterance because he thought of the horror that was going on around him, or was it who he has become afterward being in such a horrific place for so long? I truly love the event that Conrad really makes use of this character in every way possible to get us to think of Kurtz, and I think thats what made him such an bang-up writer. Hes able to follow what savagery represents by having these thoughts cross our minds as we read throughout this book.