Venezuela's Preposition On Human Rights And An International Criminal Court

Venezuelas Preposition on Human Rights and an world(prenominal) Criminal Court         We the politics of Venezuela formally state our stance on the incumbent issues for talks of pitying rights. We positioning these human rights as a comprehensive usual of achievement for all peoples and all nations. To end that any psyche and each resident to society, ground this preposition shall keep it endlessly in mind of our point of view on the quest issues and sight to promote esteem for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures to keep au fait recognition on the outlook of these circumstances.         For the issue of planetary models of addressing the oecumenic Declaration of Human Rights. On the issue of the UDHR being bowdlerize from a standard of achievement to a binding internationalist agreement we formally debate that it should be binded, but to close to extent. If The Declaration of Human Rights was to be binde d, it would be a standard that every orbit entrust be expected to partake in agreement. We turn over that the UDHR needs nearly tyke changes in clarity and arrangement before it should be binded.         The primary(prenominal) rights in the UDHR that deserve a precedency of protection would be command and health c atomic number 18. Education, due to the item that the country should be pass on in the generations of their citizens and for the common good that every citizen will cumulate a more realization and be fitted to work substantially with ane an opposite. Health care should be a major priority for the care of each and every citizen to be equally tough and hospitalized for health and common well being.         On the issue of who the UDHR in reality applies to, we cogitate that the account should throw to every individual in every country as universal guidelines of common respect and order amongst every citizen of every co untry or civilization. Yet, the f conduct t! hat it is but a memorandum of guidelines as present, If changes were applied to the UDHR, we regard they should be as critical as possible, so in that locationfore, on that point are no misunderstandings in the clarity of the document and every atomic number 53 is on topic. Yet, no subject what, some countries wont even want to gather in anything to do with the UDHR. The UDHR would also be time devour for many leaders and representatives to sign. Our main view on the UDHR is that it should convey binding to all countries after changes are made in clarity and the specificness of its aspects. For its sovereignty we sincerely believe that it should be abet to national sovereignty.         On the issue of the penalties for countries that do not act up the rights that they hurl toped and guaranteed to their citizens we believe that this document should be super respected and followed as pledged. Therefore, if a country were to pledge to the UDHR and no t incite the rights we sincerely believe that they should be fined a certain amount of money only for meaning and eyesight correction and justice to respect their citizens and everyone else that pledged to the document.         If somebody were to government agency early(a) countries with out the presence of media in a non-political way, we believe this would be nearly impossible and is also unsporting for the likely understanding and growth of the economies around to be influenced by this justice.         For issues on the emergence of the construction of an internationalistic Criminal Court, we believe that one should be accomplished yet mostly to go done the UDHR and with limitations by the power of the people. We think the ICC is a great sentiment to influence other countries in a just and jaunty manner as for them to hold back a more understanding of the common standards of the UDHR.

Yet no matter how reluctant this would be, the undercoat would always have views on the trails from the ICC.         We want the ICC to be schematic only after changes are made to its power and limitations only to protect and provide a well organized surround for the people. As a system of organization we recommend that the ICC have a trial only if it is referred by the country that the matter or crime was present in.         If there was construction of an multinational Criminal Court, it should not be able to hold shifts without curb of the Security Council because of the limitations and powers of the justice system because of the order and sufficiency of the law.          If there was construction of an foreign Criminal Court, there should be changes in the power of the court voted in by majority of the other countries that follow the same guidelines of rights of their people and the same type of governments that uphold the UDHR.         If there were construction of an International Criminal Court, there would be no real way to control the knowledge of the frequent but only to lower the publicity that each slipperiness will receive.         As a follow up we super respect both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court and would like to see changes in the UDHR as enforced by other means mostly by the ICC but with power from the people as a well-formed construction and order to a system of benefits and justice for all.         In cerebrate this document, the proceeding on all stances are our current views on each circumstance as of November 7, 2001 If you want to get a fu! ll essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper